The Indo-Iranian RSS - PKK Node:Exposing Fake Hindu Gods:Invention of the Persians to wage wars against Christians and Muslims.







The truth is like a lion ๐Ÿฆ
It can stand alone on itself 
It doesn't need nothing and noone
Cause It Is. 

Sant ' Agostino. 

Starting from a Pkk and RSS intertwining analysis, I am going to explain the common origins of Hinduism turned Hindutva from Persia to India and why Kurdistan matters in this. They act all of them against the Sunni Muslims and against the Catholic Church. 
Communists, Anarchists and Rationalist Atheists that are Mercenaries in disguise, allowed such transnational networks to enter inside Europe. 







PKK Networks in Europe and Diaspora Links

Structured Infrastructure

The PKK operates across Europe through umbrella organizations such as KCDK‑E and KNK, which coordinate hundreds of front associations and community centers. These entities engage in lobbying, propaganda, fundraising, and logistical support. Their presence is documented in multiple EU countries, with particularly strong networks in Germany and France, and smaller but notable cells in Italy.

Activities and Fronts

Historical analyses show that the PKK has used NGOs, media outlets, and commercial circuits as legal covers. Europol and NATO reports have highlighted coercive fundraising practices and criminal activities connected to the European PKK network.

Iranian Dimension (PJAK/KCK)

The PJAK movement is considered the Iranian branch of the broader KCK network, strengthening the role of Iranian Kurds within the PKK ecosystem. This dimension explains operational and cultural intersections with Iranian networks both regionally and within the diaspora.

Hindutva/RSS in the Diaspora

Transnational Diffusion

The Hindutva message, promoted by the RSS and its affiliates, is actively exported through diaspora organizations. Campaigns include media outreach, fundraising, and political mobilization. A notable example was the Leicester unrest in the UK, where diaspora Hindutva groups amplified tensions through digital platforms.

Organization and Financing

Academic research has traced financial flows between diaspora communities and Hindu Right organizations in India. The RSS/BJP network has established affiliates in Europe for decades, creating infrastructure that supports ideological and political initiatives abroad.

Iranian Nodes as Bridges

Varied Diaspora

The Iranian diaspora in Europe is large and diverse, with ethnic and political subgroups that facilitate connections and exchanges. This diversity increases the likelihood of “bridge functions” between Kurdish and Indian networks in local environments.

Operational Intersections

Recent geopolitical analyses indicate contacts and even military technology transfers between Iranian actors and segments of the PKK network. These transnational relations can reverberate within diaspora communities, creating hybrid alliances.

Hindutva Links to Kurdish and Iranian Networks

Evidence suggests that diaspora Hindutva groups, while primarily focused on India, have intersected with other transnational networks:

Shared digital platforms: Telegram and other messaging apps have hosted both Hindutva and Kurdish militant content, creating overlapping spaces of radicalization.

Diaspora fundraising: Similar methods of community fundraising and cultural associations are used by both PKK‑linked groups and Hindutva affiliates, sometimes within the same urban environments.

Iranian intermediaries: Iranian diaspora actors, positioned between Middle Eastern and South Asian communities, have occasionally facilitated connections—whether cultural, logistical, or ideological—between Kurdish militants and Hindutva activists.

Conclusion

The convergence of PKK diaspora structures, Hindutva networks, and Iranian intermediaries illustrates how transnational ideologies can overlap in European contexts. These intersections do not imply formal alliances but highlight the porous nature of diaspora politics, where local grievances, global conflicts, and ideological exports intertwine.

Pakistan is a target of India and Kurdistan PKK people togheter. Iran seemed friendly with Pakistanis long ago but that was a mere illusion :

Why Iran is not aligned with Pakistan
- Sectarian divide: Iran is a Shi’a state, while Pakistan is majority Sunni. This creates deep mistrust, especially as Pakistan has historically supported Sunni militant groups (including the Taliban) that have targeted Shi’a communities.  
- Proxy conflicts: Iran often backs groups opposed to Pakistan’s allies. For example, Pakistan has supported Turkey in regional disputes, while Iran has clashed with Turkey over influence in Syria and Iraq.  
- Border tensions: Iran accuses Pakistan of harboring Sunni extremist groups like Jaish ul-Adl in Balochistan, leading to direct military clashes in 2024.  

Why India is not aligned with Pakistan

Historic rivalry: Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought multiple wars (1947, 1965, 1971, 1999). Kashmir remains the central unresolved conflict.

Strategic partnerships: India has cultivated closer ties with Iran, especially for energy and access to Afghanistan via the Chabahar Port, bypassing Pakistan. This makes India and Iran natural partners against Pakistan’s influence.

Ideological opposition: Pakistan’s support for Islamist groups in Kashmir is seen by India as state-sponsored terrorism, reinforcing hostility. 

Why PKK is not aligned with Pakistan

Different priorities: The PKK’s struggle is focused on Kurdish autonomy in Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. Pakistan has no interest in supporting Kurdish separatism.

Pakistan–Turkey alliance: Pakistan is a close ally of Turkey, which is the PKK’s main adversary. Supporting PKK would directly undermine Pakistan’s strategic partnership with Ankara.

Regional positioning: PKK networks often intersect with Iranian and sometimes Indian interests, but Pakistan’s alignment with Turkey and Sunni blocs makes cooperation impossible.

The Triangular Dynamic

Iran + PKK: Iran tolerates or manipulates Kurdish groups (like PJAK) but sees Pakistan as a Sunni rival.

India + Iran: India partners with Iran for energy and trade, bypassing Pakistan.

Pakistan + Turkey: Pakistan’s alliance with Turkey automatically places it against PKK and limits cooperation with Iran and India.

Iran, India, and PKK networks are not allies of Pakistan because:

Iran distrusts Pakistan’s Sunni alliances and Taliban ties.

India is locked in a historic rivalry with Pakistan over Kashmir.

PKK is opposed to Turkey, Pakistan’s closest ally.

Together, these factors create a geopolitical triangle of opposition, where Iran, India, and PKK find overlapping interests that exclude Pakistan.







© Paola Blondet ๐Ÿงฟ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿป‍♀️๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น❤️๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท





๐Ÿ“ฐ Leggi su Times of India: Uttarakhand e Hindutva ๐Ÿ”— Leggi su Patheos: Origini dell'Hinduism  

 The ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿง Truth ๐Ÿ“– Leggi su BollywoodShaadis: Zubin Irani  

They are ideologues of hatred like that of the RSS. Madhav Golwalkar was a Parsi like today Zubin Irani the husband of Smrti Irani, that Hindutva lady promoting disinformation campaigns in BJP since 2023
Origin and historical role of the Parsis in India

Migrations and settlement: the Parsis are descendants of Persian Zoroastrians who migrated to India (Gujarat) between the eighth and tenth centuries; The language of reference is Gujarati, a Zoroastrian religion. The community is historically concentrated in Bombay/Mumbai, with a strong presence in commerce and urban professions.




Identity and definitions: the term "Parsis" emerges in Indian and European sources between the twelfth-fourteenth centuries; The definition of the community has been the subject of internal and legal debate (patrilineal lines contested and outdated over time).


Social capital: Thanks to education and urban economies, the Parsis have played important roles in public and philanthropic life, contributing to the economic and cultural modernization of colonial and postcolonial India.

Revival of Hinduism: Historical and Semantic Frameworks


"Hinduism" as a term of Persian origin: the word "Hinduism" has Persian etymological origin and is used to designate the religion/social order of India; In the modern period it becomes an identity and political umbrella, especially in a nationalist key.

From pluralism to nationalism: the modern codification of Hinduism (texts, reforms, iconographies) has sometimes simplified pluralism into a national canon, opening up space for ideologies such as Hindutva that link religion, culture and citizenship. This transformation is historically attested; Its operational diagnosis requires comparing historical sources, reformist texts and political discourses. 


Parsi and Hindutva: reception dynamics and "exemplary minority"


Narrative of integration: in some nationalist readings, the Parsis are presented as a "loyal" minority and integrated into the majority order (respect for local symbols and norms, absence of antagonistic claims). This rhetorical use produces a hierarchy between minorities and legitimizes a model of cultural conformity. The thesis is consistent with studies on ideological constructions of religious nationalism and on the selection of "model minorities" in majority contexts; it must be documented with texts by ideologues and cases of public rhetoric.


Sociological factors: small demographic size, strong urbanization, high educational capital/professionalism and entrepreneurship have historically facilitated the public position of the Parsis, making them compatible with nationalist modernization projects. This does not imply a monolithic membership: the community is plural and politically diverse.


Timeline:


VIII–X century: Zoroastrian migrations in Gujarat


XVIII–XX century: concentration in Bombay/Mumbai; Commercial and professional rise


XIX–XX centuries: modern codifications of Hinduism; birth/use of the term; mass devotional iconographies

Parsi genealogy: historical texts, legal acts, censuses


Hindutva Discourses on Minorities: Ideological Writings, Press Archives, Parliamentarians


Iconography: catalogues of devotional prints, museums, art history studies


Semantic Comparison: Use of "Hinduism" in Modern Reforms and Manuals

XX–XXI centuries: religious nationalism (Hindutva); rhetoric on "model minorities"

PKK Networks in Europe and Diaspora Links


Structured Infrastructure


The PKK operates across Europe through umbrella organizations such as KCDK‑E and KNK, which coordinate hundreds of front associations and community centers. These entities engage in lobbying, propaganda, fundraising, and logistical support. Their presence is documented in multiple EU countries, with particularly strong networks in Germany and France, and smaller but notable cells in Italy.


Activities and Fronts


Historical analyses show that the PKK has used NGOs, media outlets, and commercial circuits as legal covers. Europol and NATO reports have highlighted coercive fundraising practices and criminal activities connected to the European PKK network.


Iranian Dimension (PJAK/KCK)


The PJAK movement is considered the Iranian branch of the broader KCK network, strengthening the role of Iranian Kurds within the PKK ecosystem. This dimension explains operational and cultural intersections with Iranian networks both regionally and within the diaspora.


Hindutva/RSS in the Diaspora


Transnational Diffusion


The Hindutva message, promoted by the RSS and its affiliates, is actively exported through diaspora organizations. Campaigns include media outreach, fundraising, and political mobilization. A notable example was the Leicester unrest in the UK, where diaspora Hindutva groups amplified tensions through digital platforms.


Organization and Financing


Academic research has traced financial flows between diaspora communities and Hindu Right organizations in India. The RSS/BJP network has established affiliates in Europe for decades, creating infrastructure that supports ideological and political initiatives abroad.


Iranian Nodes as Bridges


Varied Diaspora


The Iranian diaspora in Europe is large and diverse, with ethnic and political subgroups that facilitate connections and exchanges. This diversity increases the likelihood of “bridge functions” between Kurdish and Indian networks in local environments.


Operational Intersections


Recent geopolitical analyses indicate contacts and even military technology transfers between Iranian actors and segments of the PKK network. These transnational relations can reverberate within diaspora communities, creating hybrid alliances.


Hindutva Links to Kurdish and Iranian Networks


Evidence suggests that diaspora Hindutva groups, while primarily focused on India, have intersected with other transnational networks:


Shared digital platforms: Telegram and other messaging apps have hosted both Hindutva and Kurdish militant content, creating overlapping spaces of radicalization.


Diaspora fundraising: Similar methods of community fundraising and cultural associations are used by both PKK‑linked groups and Hindutva affiliates, sometimes within the same urban environments.


Iranian intermediaries: Iranian diaspora actors, positioned between Middle Eastern and South Asian communities, have occasionally facilitated connections—whether cultural, logistical, or ideological—between Kurdish militants and Hindutva activists.


Conclusion


The convergence of PKK diaspora structures, Hindutva networks, and Iranian intermediaries illustrates how transnational ideologies can overlap in European contexts. These intersections do not imply formal alliances but highlight the porous nature of diaspora politics, where local grievances, global conflicts, and ideological exports intertwine.


©๐Ÿงฟ Paola Blondet ๐ŸŒบ✍๐Ÿป๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿป‍♀️๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น❤️๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท



© 2025 Paola Blondet – Tutti i diritti riservati.
Questo contenuto รจ originale e pubblicato su My Digital MSN Village .

รˆ consentita la condivisione del link con attribuzione alla fonte.
Non รจ consentita la riproduzione integrale senza autorizzazione dell’autrice.

Copyright

Commenti